Seeking to explain thermodynamics based on moving and interacting atoms

Chapter 15 – Calorimetry: Heat of reaction (ΔHrxn)

Calorimetry: Heat of reaction, heat of mixing, heat of anything.

The change in enthalpy of reaction ΔHrxn is one of the two critical quantities — alongside TΔS — that together determine reaction spontaneity through the Gibbs energy framework established above. It is also one of the most directly measurable quantities in all of thermodynamics.

ΔHrxn is measured in a reaction calorimeter operating at constant pressure and temperature — typically 1 atm and 25°C for standard conditions. The reaction proceeds inside the calorimeter and the heating or cooling required to maintain constant temperature is measured. That quantity is ΔHrxn. Negative values correspond to an exothermic reaction — the system releases energy and the calorimeter must remove it to hold temperature constant. Positive values correspond to an endothermic reaction — the system absorbs energy and the calorimeter must supply it.

It is worth noting the distinction between this constant-pressure calorimeter and the bomb calorimeter, which operates at constant volume. The constant-pressure calorimeter measures ΔH — the enthalpy change. The bomb calorimeter measures ΔU — the change in internal energy. The two differ by the PV work term, as established in the enthalpy section above. Both are valid and useful; the choice depends on the conditions of interest.

Now consider what physically happens during a reaction to cause a heat effect — a non-zero ΔHrxn. The events that lead to a heat effect involve the rearrangement of both atoms and electrons, specifically:

All of these events result in a change in the internal energy of the system — both kinetic and potential contributions — which at constant pressure manifests as the measurable heat effect quantified by ΔHrxn.

The challenge now in front of us is connecting these microscopic events to the macroscopic composite properties built upon ΔHrxn — particularly the change in Gibbs energy, which governs reaction spontaneity, maximum work, and equilibrium. Can these connections be made exact? Can they be parsed into one-to-one micro-to-macro connections that illuminate the physical meaning of TΔS? These questions will be addressed in later chapters.

END